Intent | Describes the goal of the Impact Topic or Foundation Requirements and why it is important, and establishes the link between the requirements and their outcome. |
Outcome | Outlines the intended result of the Impact Topic or Foundation Requirements. Outcomes represent the collective aspirations of the B Corp community. |
Scope | Explains who or what the requirements apply to (i.e. the company’s operations, value chain, or stakeholders). |
Notes | Sets out how the Impact Topic or Foundation Requirements align with other Impact Topics, or describes details of the requirements. Included only when relevant. |
Terms and Definitions | Defines key terms used in the new standards. The defined meanings are essential to understanding the requirements. |
Requirements | Includes the requirements and sub-requirements of the new standards. The company needs to meet these requirements, and in some cases maintain or continuously improve upon them, to achieve B Corp Certification.
Sub-requirements in some Impact Topics have a set of options for companies to choose from. These are labeled with an “O”.
Each requirement and sub-requirement has an ID code to identify which Impact Topic it falls under. For example, PSG1.1 is a sub-requirement of the PSG1 requirement, in the Purpose & Stakeholder Governance Impact Topic.
|
Each sub-requirement includes: |
Track Factors | Identify company attributes, including:
These determine which sub-requirements apply to the company. |
Year | Indicate the number of years the company has until it must comply with the sub-requirement.
To maintain B Corp certification, companies must continually comply with all applicable sub-requirements as soon as they become effective.
|
Eligible for the equity mechanism | Identifies whether the sub-requirement can have the equity mechanism applied. “Yes” means the sub-requirement is eligible; “no” means it is ineligible.
The equity mechanism applies to companies based in a country or territory with “some” or “more” operational barriers.
If the company qualifies for the equity mechanism, it can choose to be exempt from a percentage of the eligible sub-requirements but will need to provide a justification based on its operational barriers.
All companies need to meet all sub-requirements that are ineligible for the equity mechanism. |
Compliance Criteria | Sets out the mandatory actions that the company needs to implement to meet and demonstrate meeting the sub-requirement. |
Intent | Describes the sub-requirement’s intended outcome. |
Clarifying the Compliance Criteria | Provides additional information about what is needed to meet the compliance criteria. |
Applying the Criteria to Independently Certifying Subsidiaries
| Clarifies how the sub-requirement applies to independently certifying subsidiaries |
Further guidance | Provides additional information about how to understand and implement the sub-requirement. Does not include mandatory actions. |
Recommendations | Provides non-mandatory recommendations for implementing the sub-requirement, such as: |
Implementation Resources | Include useful links, in available languages, to help the company implement each sub-requirement, such as: guides tools databases standards
|
Interoperability | Lists matching or overlapping data and information from other standards and frameworks that help meet the requirements in the new standards. As defined below, these may be a “conceptual alignment data point” with the B Lab standards, or have “equivalency data point”. Note: i) this does not equate to a verification exemption of the sub-requirement. ii) B Lab will regularly update (frequency tbc) the interoperability section in the B Impact Assessment to ensure highlighted data points from other standards and frameworks are up to date. |
Conceptual Alignment Data Point | Lists metrics or qualitative data points from other standards and frameworks that contribute to meeting the sub-requirement.
A conceptual alignment data point that is from other standards or frameworks is directly related to the sub-requirement, but may have slight differences in scope, specificity, or methodology.
Despite the differences, the company may use the method or tool, or take the data as a starting point to produce data that meets the sub-requirement. |
Equivalency Data Point
| Lists metrics or qualitative data points from other standards and frameworks that exactly match the data sought to meet the sub-requirement.
The company can apply the method, tool, or data used in the other standard or framework directly to meet the sub-requirement in the B Lab standards. |